What must a lawyer do when withdrawing if they have not been paid, but there's insufficient time to replace them?

When a lawyer finds themselves in a situation where they have not been paid and there is insufficient time to find a replacement attorney, the appropriate action is to attempt to have the trial adjourned. This step is crucial because it safeguards the client's right to adequate representation and ensures that they are not left without legal counsel during a critical phase of their case.

By seeking an adjournment, the lawyer is acting in the best interest of the client. It acknowledges that the withdrawal could jeopardize the client’s case if they are suddenly unrepresented at trial. An adjournment allows the client time to find a new attorney who can step in and represent them effectively.

Other options do not address the urgency of the situation effectively. For example, continuing without pay until trial does not resolve the payment issue and places the lawyer in a potentially unethical position. Notifying the client of their withdrawal is necessary, but it does not provide a solution for the lack of representation during the trial. Filing a fee dispute with the court may be an option in a different context, but it does not directly provide immediate support and representation for the client when there is a pressing deadline.