Which of the following is NOT typically assessed during a withdrawal by defense counsel?

The assessment of a withdrawal by defense counsel typically centers around factors that can materially affect the integrity of the legal process and the client's defense. The conduct of the lawyer, the history of proceedings, and the potential impact on the accused due to delay are all relevant in evaluating whether a withdrawal might prejudice the case or disrupt the judicial process.

The conduct of the lawyer is assessed to ensure that the withdrawal is appropriate and justified, particularly if the relationship between the client and attorney has deteriorated or if the attorney can no longer ethically continue representation. The history of proceedings is also important, as it provides the context of how the case has developed and any implications that a withdrawal might have on ongoing legal strategy and client representation.

Evaluating the impact on the accused from any delays caused by the withdrawal is crucial as it can affect the accused’s rights to a fair and speedy trial. Courts are particularly concerned with ensuring that defendants are not unduly prejudiced by changes in representation.

In contrast, the financial history of the client is generally not a direct consideration in the context of withdrawal. While financial issues can lead to withdrawal, they do not form part of the standard assessment criteria when a lawyer seeks to withdraw from representing a client. The focus during a withdrawal is more aligned with